RUO Home

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo

View Item 
  •   RUO Home
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   RUO Home
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • View Item
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of RUOCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issnAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issn

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

RECENTLY ADDED

Last submissions
Repository
How to publish
Resources
FAQs

Pensamiento difuso, pero no confuso: de Aristóteles a Zadeh y vuelta

Author:
Velarde Lombraña, JuliánUniovi authority
Publication date:
1996
Editorial:

Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias

Citación:
Psicothema, 8(2), p. 435-444 (1996)
Descripción física:
p. 435-444
Abstract:

Fuzzy set and fuzzy logic theory was initiated by Zadeh in 1965. Since then, this theory was fully studied and used for the analysis, modelling, and control of technological and non-technological systems. In the early 1990s Japanese engineers have led the fuzzy revolution at the level of high-technology consumer products. The creeping fuzziness in the high technology of Eastern countries is explained by Kosko in Fuzzy Thinking (1994) as influence of the Zen Buddhism in Japanese thought and culture: Aristotle (Bivalence, A or not-A, exact, all or none, 0 or 1, digital computer, Fortran, bits) vs. the Buddha (multivalence, A and not-A, partial, some degree, continuum between 0 and 1, neural network (brain), natural language, fits). This paper presents a critical examination of that dichotomy, and we refute several theses which Kosko attributes mistakenly to Aristotle.

Fuzzy set and fuzzy logic theory was initiated by Zadeh in 1965. Since then, this theory was fully studied and used for the analysis, modelling, and control of technological and non-technological systems. In the early 1990s Japanese engineers have led the fuzzy revolution at the level of high-technology consumer products. The creeping fuzziness in the high technology of Eastern countries is explained by Kosko in Fuzzy Thinking (1994) as influence of the Zen Buddhism in Japanese thought and culture: Aristotle (Bivalence, A or not-A, exact, all or none, 0 or 1, digital computer, Fortran, bits) vs. the Buddha (multivalence, A and not-A, partial, some degree, continuum between 0 and 1, neural network (brain), natural language, fits). This paper presents a critical examination of that dichotomy, and we refute several theses which Kosko attributes mistakenly to Aristotle.

URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10651/23318
ISSN:
0214-9915
Collections
  • Artículos [37532]
  • Filosofía [334]
Files in this item
Thumbnail
untranslated
PS8_JVL1996.pdf (36.97Kb)
Compartir
Exportar a Mendeley
Estadísticas de uso
Estadísticas de uso
Metadata
Show full item record
Página principal Uniovi

Biblioteca

Contacto

Facebook Universidad de OviedoTwitter Universidad de Oviedo
The content of the Repository, unless otherwise specified, is protected with a Creative Commons license: Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Internacional
Creative Commons Image