Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Pensamiento difuso, pero no confuso: de Aristóteles a Zadeh y vuelta

dc.contributor.authorVelarde Lombraña, Julián 
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-06T07:42:18Z
dc.date.available2014-03-06T07:42:18Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.citationPsicothema, 8(2), p. 435-444 (1996)
dc.identifier.issn0214-9915
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10651/23318
dc.description.abstractFuzzy set and fuzzy logic theory was initiated by Zadeh in 1965. Since then, this theory was fully studied and used for the analysis, modelling, and control of technological and non-technological systems. In the early 1990s Japanese engineers have led the fuzzy revolution at the level of high-technology consumer products. The creeping fuzziness in the high technology of Eastern countries is explained by Kosko in Fuzzy Thinking (1994) as influence of the Zen Buddhism in Japanese thought and culture: Aristotle (Bivalence, A or not-A, exact, all or none, 0 or 1, digital computer, Fortran, bits) vs. the Buddha (multivalence, A and not-A, partial, some degree, continuum between 0 and 1, neural network (brain), natural language, fits). This paper presents a critical examination of that dichotomy, and we refute several theses which Kosko attributes mistakenly to Aristotle.
dc.format.extentp. 435-444
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherColegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
dc.relation.ispartofPsicothema
dc.rights© 1996 Psicothema
dc.sourceDialnet
dc.source.urihttp://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2014605&orden=70432&info=link
dc.titlePensamiento difuso, pero no confuso: de Aristóteles a Zadeh y vuelta
dc.typejournal article
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access


Ficheros en el ítem

untranslated

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem