RUO Principal

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo

Ver ítem 
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo RUOComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issnPerfil de autorEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issn

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

AÑADIDO RECIENTEMENTE

Novedades
Repositorio
Cómo publicar
Recursos
FAQs

Pensamiento difuso, pero no confuso: de Aristóteles a Zadeh y vuelta

Autor(es) y otros:
Velarde Lombraña, JuliánAutoridad Uniovi
Fecha de publicación:
1996
Editorial:

Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias

Citación:
Psicothema, 8(2), p. 435-444 (1996)
Descripción física:
p. 435-444
Resumen:

Fuzzy set and fuzzy logic theory was initiated by Zadeh in 1965. Since then, this theory was fully studied and used for the analysis, modelling, and control of technological and non-technological systems. In the early 1990s Japanese engineers have led the fuzzy revolution at the level of high-technology consumer products. The creeping fuzziness in the high technology of Eastern countries is explained by Kosko in Fuzzy Thinking (1994) as influence of the Zen Buddhism in Japanese thought and culture: Aristotle (Bivalence, A or not-A, exact, all or none, 0 or 1, digital computer, Fortran, bits) vs. the Buddha (multivalence, A and not-A, partial, some degree, continuum between 0 and 1, neural network (brain), natural language, fits). This paper presents a critical examination of that dichotomy, and we refute several theses which Kosko attributes mistakenly to Aristotle.

Fuzzy set and fuzzy logic theory was initiated by Zadeh in 1965. Since then, this theory was fully studied and used for the analysis, modelling, and control of technological and non-technological systems. In the early 1990s Japanese engineers have led the fuzzy revolution at the level of high-technology consumer products. The creeping fuzziness in the high technology of Eastern countries is explained by Kosko in Fuzzy Thinking (1994) as influence of the Zen Buddhism in Japanese thought and culture: Aristotle (Bivalence, A or not-A, exact, all or none, 0 or 1, digital computer, Fortran, bits) vs. the Buddha (multivalence, A and not-A, partial, some degree, continuum between 0 and 1, neural network (brain), natural language, fits). This paper presents a critical examination of that dichotomy, and we refute several theses which Kosko attributes mistakenly to Aristotle.

URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10651/23318
ISSN:
0214-9915
Colecciones
  • Artículos [37534]
  • Filosofía [334]
Ficheros en el ítem
Thumbnail
untranslated
PS8_JVL1996.pdf (36.97Kb)
Compartir
Exportar a Mendeley
Estadísticas de uso
Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Página principal Uniovi

Biblioteca

Contacto

Facebook Universidad de OviedoTwitter Universidad de Oviedo
El contenido del Repositorio, a menos que se indique lo contrario, está protegido con una licencia Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Creative Commons Image