Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Comparison of the periimplant bone stress distribution on three fixed partial supported prosthesis designs under different loading. A 3D finite element analysis

dc.contributor.authordeLlanos-Lanchares, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez-Arenal, Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorBobes Bascaran, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Gutiérrez, Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorSuarez Sanchez, Ana 
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Álvarez, Francisco 
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T08:17:43Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T08:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 31:6, 875-888 (2020); doi:10.1080/0952813X.2019.1572656spa
dc.identifier.issn0952-813X
dc.identifier.issn1362-3079
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10651/76298
dc.description.abstractDespite high success and survival rates of implant-supported prosthesis therapy, biomechanical complications such as periimplant bone resorp- tion continue to exist due to occlusal overloading. The purpose of this article is to analyse and compare the influence of bone density, direction and distribution of the occlusal load and the design of three-unit implant-supported prostheses. Three-dimensional finite element analysis study was developed to evaluate the influence on the periimplant bone stress distribution of three different designs of a 3-unit bridge supported by two implants (intermediate pontic, tilted implant, cantilever pontic), two different bone qualities (D3 and D4), and different loading directions (axial and non-axial) and distributions (uniform and non-uniform). Bridge configuration with intermediate pontic and parallel implants presents the lowest periimplant stress, whereas the highest stress was found on the tilted implant bridge. Bone D3 is biomechanically more favourable than D4. Non-axial and uniform loading conditions produce more peri- implant stress. Distal cantilever and 45° convergent distal tilted implant are the second and third treatment options on a posterior three-unit rehabilitation. Lightening occlusal contacts on the pontic and avoiding non-axial loading, reduce periimplant bone stress. Bone D4 increases periimplant bone strain.spa
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding This work was supported by the Spanish Economics and Competitiveness Ministry, through grant [AYA2014-57648-P] and [MINECO-18-AYA2017-89121-P] and the Government of the Principality of Asturias (Consejería de Economía y Empleo), through grant [FC-15-GRUPIN14-017].spa
dc.format.extentp. 875-888spa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisspa
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligencespa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectThree-unit bridgespa
dc.subjectocclusal loadingspa
dc.subjectbone densityspa
dc.subjecttilted implantspa
dc.subjectcantilever prosthesisspa
dc.titleComparison of the periimplant bone stress distribution on three fixed partial supported prosthesis designs under different loading. A 3D finite element analysisspa
dc.typejournal articlespa
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0952813X.2019.1572656
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//AYA2014-57648-P/ES/INVESTIGACION DE LA VIABILIDAD OPERATIVA DEL RECONSTRUCTOR TOMOGRAFICO PARA OPTICA ADAPTATIVA ASTRONOMICA CARMEN A ESCALAS E-ELT EN GPUS/ spa
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Gobierno del Principado de Asturias//GRUPIN14-017/ES/GRUPO DE MODELIZACIÓN MATEMÁTICA APLICADA EN INGENIERÍA, ECONOMÍA Y CIENCIAS DE LA SALUD/ spa
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2019.1572656
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessspa
dc.type.hasVersionAMspa


Ficheros en el ítem

untranslated

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons