RUO Home

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo

View Item 
  •   RUO Home
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   RUO Home
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • View Item
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All of RUOCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issnAuthor profilesThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issn

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

RECENTLY ADDED

Last submissions
Repository
How to publish
Resources
FAQs

A critical comparison between two different ratiometric techniques for optical luminescence sensing

Author:
Valledor Llopis, MartaUniovi authority; Campo Rodríguez, Juan CarlosUniovi authority; Ferrero Martín, Francisco JavierUniovi authority; Sánchez Barragán, IsraelUniovi authority; Costa Fernández, José ManuelUniovi authority; Sanz Medel, AlfredoUniovi authority
Subject:

Fiber Optic Sensor; Ratiometric Measurements; Fluorescence; Phosphorescence

Publication date:
2009
Publisher version:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.024
Citación:
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 139(1), P. 237-244 (2009); doi:10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.024
Descripción física:
p. 237-244
Abstract:

Luminescence has become an invaluable analytical tool for development of robust fiber optical sensors for many industrial, biomedical and environmental applications. Direct intensity measurements of the luminescent emission are, due to their simplicity, a very common measuring principle. Consequently, many optical fiber sensors are based on the intensity measurement of the luminescence emission. Unfortunately, direct luminescent intensity measurements suffer from a series of analyte-independent fluctuations, which make them inappropriate for the development of reliable instrumentation for chemical sensing applications. A possibility for solving this trouble is to measure the lifetime of the luminescence emission. The drawbacks of such approach are an increase in the complexity of the system measurement, particularly for measurement of low lifetimes (e.g. nanoseconds), but also the limited number of available chemical sensors that suffer from a change in the luminescence lifetimes after interaction with the analyte. The ratiometric measurement can solve many of the trouble previously exposed. As it is well know, ratiometric measurements are an alternative to classical intensity or lifetime measurements due to their proved insensitivity to background light and instrumental fluctuations. Thus, they can be applied to the development of robust luminescence optical sensors. In this paper two measurement systems based on ratiometric techniques are compared. One of them is a ratiometric method in the frequency domain and the other one is a wavelength ratiometric method. The analytical performance of the dynamic ratiometric method has been assessed using a phosphorescent oxygen sensor, which is a good example of a sensor that suffers a dynamic luminescence deactivation after interaction with the analyte. The potential of the proposed ratiometric systems to overcome the problems of accuracy in luminescent sensing is evaluated by constructing two respective optical fiber instruments. The interest in designing an instrumental prototype specially adapted to a particular chemical sensor is also analyzed.

Luminescence has become an invaluable analytical tool for development of robust fiber optical sensors for many industrial, biomedical and environmental applications. Direct intensity measurements of the luminescent emission are, due to their simplicity, a very common measuring principle. Consequently, many optical fiber sensors are based on the intensity measurement of the luminescence emission. Unfortunately, direct luminescent intensity measurements suffer from a series of analyte-independent fluctuations, which make them inappropriate for the development of reliable instrumentation for chemical sensing applications. A possibility for solving this trouble is to measure the lifetime of the luminescence emission. The drawbacks of such approach are an increase in the complexity of the system measurement, particularly for measurement of low lifetimes (e.g. nanoseconds), but also the limited number of available chemical sensors that suffer from a change in the luminescence lifetimes after interaction with the analyte. The ratiometric measurement can solve many of the trouble previously exposed. As it is well know, ratiometric measurements are an alternative to classical intensity or lifetime measurements due to their proved insensitivity to background light and instrumental fluctuations. Thus, they can be applied to the development of robust luminescence optical sensors. In this paper two measurement systems based on ratiometric techniques are compared. One of them is a ratiometric method in the frequency domain and the other one is a wavelength ratiometric method. The analytical performance of the dynamic ratiometric method has been assessed using a phosphorescent oxygen sensor, which is a good example of a sensor that suffers a dynamic luminescence deactivation after interaction with the analyte. The potential of the proposed ratiometric systems to overcome the problems of accuracy in luminescent sensing is evaluated by constructing two respective optical fiber instruments. The interest in designing an instrumental prototype specially adapted to a particular chemical sensor is also analyzed.

URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10651/7073
ISSN:
0925-4005
Identificador local:

20090585

DOI:
10.1016/j.snb.2009.02.024
Collections
  • Artículos [37548]
Files in this item
Métricas
Compartir
Exportar a Mendeley
Estadísticas de uso
Estadísticas de uso
Metadata
Show full item record
Página principal Uniovi

Biblioteca

Contacto

Facebook Universidad de OviedoTwitter Universidad de Oviedo
The content of the Repository, unless otherwise specified, is protected with a Creative Commons license: Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Internacional
Creative Commons Image