| dc.contributor.author | Arias Castaño, Abel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-29T08:59:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-29T08:59:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 8(1-2), p. 97-111 (2021): doi:10.1504/IJHRCS.2021.113758 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2050-103X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2050-1048 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10651/59374 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper aims at addressing a subject that according to the arguments exposed, there in, conforms a subtle constitutional paradox: the conceptual tensions in the democratic principle that arise with the creation of an instrument that is as necessary as it it is problematic such as the judicial review of constitutional reforms by a counter-majoritarian body. (i.e. the constitutional court). | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [MINECO-18-DER2017-82196-P] | |
| dc.format.extent | p. 97-111 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies | |
| dc.rights | © 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. | |
| dc.source | WOS:000631997500007 | |
| dc.subject | constitutional amendment | |
| dc.subject | constitutional law | |
| dc.title | Judicial review of constitutional amendments: a legitimate defence of democracy through a counter-majoritarian power? | |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1504/IJHRCS.2021.113758 | |
| dc.relation.projectID | MINECO-18-DER2017-82196-P | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRCS.2021.113758 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | AM | |
