RUO Principal

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo

Ver ítem 
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo RUOComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issnPerfil de autorEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issn

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

AÑADIDO RECIENTEMENTE

Novedades
Repositorio
Cómo publicar
Recursos
FAQs

Effectiveness of contingency management for smoking cessation in substance users: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Autor(es) y otros:
Secades Villa, RobertoAutoridad Uniovi; Aonso Diego, GemaAutoridad Uniovi; García Pérez, ÁngelAutoridad Uniovi; González de la Roz, AlbaAutoridad Uniovi
Palabra(s) clave:

meta-analysis

contingency management

effectiveness

smoking cessation

substance use disorder

Fecha de publicación:
2020
Versión del editor:
https://content.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ccp0000611
Citación:
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(10), p. 951-964 (2020); doi:10.1037/ccp0000611
Descripción física:
p. 951-964
Resumen:

Objective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (ID: CRD42019122315) to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of contingency management (CM) to promote smoking abstinence among individuals with substance use disorder or in recovery. Method. Databases were PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EBSCO. The primary eligibility criteria for inclusion in our meta-analysis were as follows: any study examining the efficacy of CM for smoking cessation that reported smoking abstinence and/or cigarette reductions. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality assessment tool. Publication bias was examined using Egger’s regression intercept, the Begg-Mazumdar test, and Tweedie’s trim-and-fill approach. Results. A total of 22 articles were included, and 13 were included in three meta-analyses: abstinence at posttreatment (12 studies), abstinence at follow-up (8 studies), and reduction outcomes at posttreatment (6 studies). CM was superior to comparison arms in smoking abstinence (RR= 2.555; 95%CI: 1.730-3.775; p < .001) and reduction (SMD=.601; 95%CI: 0.372, 0.831; p < .001) at end-of-treatment. At long-term follow-ups, CM did not show enhanced effects over abstinence beyond those shown in comparison arms (RR=1.029; 95%CI: 0.577, 1.836; p = .922). Smoking-cessation treatment (all treatments included CM) and smoking abstinence increased the likelihood of abstinence from alcohol and/or illicit drugs. All studies were rated as being of strong or moderate quality and no marked presence of publication bias was found. Conclusions. CM for smoking cessation in individuals with substance use disorders performs significantly better than control conditions in reducing smoking at end-of-treatment.

Objective. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (ID: CRD42019122315) to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of contingency management (CM) to promote smoking abstinence among individuals with substance use disorder or in recovery. Method. Databases were PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EBSCO. The primary eligibility criteria for inclusion in our meta-analysis were as follows: any study examining the efficacy of CM for smoking cessation that reported smoking abstinence and/or cigarette reductions. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality assessment tool. Publication bias was examined using Egger’s regression intercept, the Begg-Mazumdar test, and Tweedie’s trim-and-fill approach. Results. A total of 22 articles were included, and 13 were included in three meta-analyses: abstinence at posttreatment (12 studies), abstinence at follow-up (8 studies), and reduction outcomes at posttreatment (6 studies). CM was superior to comparison arms in smoking abstinence (RR= 2.555; 95%CI: 1.730-3.775; p < .001) and reduction (SMD=.601; 95%CI: 0.372, 0.831; p < .001) at end-of-treatment. At long-term follow-ups, CM did not show enhanced effects over abstinence beyond those shown in comparison arms (RR=1.029; 95%CI: 0.577, 1.836; p = .922). Smoking-cessation treatment (all treatments included CM) and smoking abstinence increased the likelihood of abstinence from alcohol and/or illicit drugs. All studies were rated as being of strong or moderate quality and no marked presence of publication bias was found. Conclusions. CM for smoking cessation in individuals with substance use disorders performs significantly better than control conditions in reducing smoking at end-of-treatment.

URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10651/58141
ISSN:
0022-006X
DOI:
10.1037/ccp0000611
Colecciones
  • Artículos [37548]
  • Psicología [1482]
Ficheros en el ítem
Thumbnail
untranslated
Postprint (740.2Kb)
Métricas
Compartir
Exportar a Mendeley
Estadísticas de uso
Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Página principal Uniovi

Biblioteca

Contacto

Facebook Universidad de OviedoTwitter Universidad de Oviedo
El contenido del Repositorio, a menos que se indique lo contrario, está protegido con una licencia Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Creative Commons Image