An Exploration of the Reliability and Validity of the Spanish Version of the "Voice and You" (VAY): A Scale for Measuring the Relationship with Voices
Author:
![Uniovi authority Uniovi authority](/dspace/themes/Mirage2/images/autoridades/autoridad.png)
Publication date:
Editorial:
Wiley
Citación:
Descripción física:
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to adapt the ‘Voice and You’ Scale (VAY) (Hayward, Denney, Vaughan, & Fowler, 2008) to Spanish and explore its psychometric properties for measuring the perceived relationship with voices. A sample of 50 psychiatric patients with verbal auditory hallucinations (48 had a psychotic disorder and two a borderline personality disorder) was used. Its reliability was calculated using the Cronbach's α and test–retest, and concurrent validity by the Pearson correlation coefficient of the VAY with the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire and the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales. The results showed that internal consistency of the Spanish version of the VAY ranged from 0.74 to 0.84 on the various subscales, and test–retest reliability varied from 0.74 to 0.83 on three subscales (voice ‘dominance’, ‘intrusiveness’ and hearer ‘dependence’), and was lower (0.68) on the hearer ‘distance’ subscale. Concurrent validity was acceptable as significant associations were found with the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire and the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales subscales. It is concluded that the Spanish version of the VAY is a reliable and valid instrument that can assist the exploration of voices within relational frameworks across research and clinical domains
The purpose of this study was to adapt the ‘Voice and You’ Scale (VAY) (Hayward, Denney, Vaughan, & Fowler, 2008) to Spanish and explore its psychometric properties for measuring the perceived relationship with voices. A sample of 50 psychiatric patients with verbal auditory hallucinations (48 had a psychotic disorder and two a borderline personality disorder) was used. Its reliability was calculated using the Cronbach's α and test–retest, and concurrent validity by the Pearson correlation coefficient of the VAY with the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire and the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales. The results showed that internal consistency of the Spanish version of the VAY ranged from 0.74 to 0.84 on the various subscales, and test–retest reliability varied from 0.74 to 0.83 on three subscales (voice ‘dominance’, ‘intrusiveness’ and hearer ‘dependence’), and was lower (0.68) on the hearer ‘distance’ subscale. Concurrent validity was acceptable as significant associations were found with the Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire and the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales subscales. It is concluded that the Spanish version of the VAY is a reliable and valid instrument that can assist the exploration of voices within relational frameworks across research and clinical domains
ISSN:
Collections
- Artículos [35470]