RUO Principal

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo

Ver ítem 
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo RUOComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issnPerfil de autorEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issn

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

AÑADIDO RECIENTEMENTE

Novedades
Repositorio
Cómo publicar
Recursos
FAQs

Neuropsycological, psychophysiological and personality assessment of DSM-IV clusters of personality disorders.

Autor(es) y otros:
Besteiro González, José LuisAutoridad Uniovi; Lemos Giráldez, SerafínAutoridad Uniovi; Muñiz, José
Editor/Coord./Trad.:
Besteiro, José
Palabra(s) clave:

DSM clusters, external validity

Fecha de publicación:
2004
Editorial:

European Association of Psychological Assessment y International Association of Applied Psychology

Versión del editor:
https://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.20.2.99
Citación:
European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(2), p. 99-105 (2004); doi:10.1027/1015-5759.20.2.99
Descripción física:
p. 99-105
Resumen:

Testing the construct validity of the three DSM-IV cluster groupings of personality disorders, in terms of neuropsychological, psychophysiological, and personality traits measures, was the purpose of this study. The results hardly confirm significant differences between B and C cluster groups in their neuropsychological functioning, but, instead, suggest that Cluster A could have some empirical validity based on executive prefrontal deficits (concept formation and sustained attention tasks) and clinical features. Similarly, no consistent differences among groups emerge when psychophysiological measures are compared. With regard to the Big-Five personality dimensions, the results also indicate that clusters may be more heterogeneous than the DSM-IV suggests. It appears, therefore, that the categorical division of DSM personality disorders into three discrete clusters may not be empirically justified.

Testing the construct validity of the three DSM-IV cluster groupings of personality disorders, in terms of neuropsychological, psychophysiological, and personality traits measures, was the purpose of this study. The results hardly confirm significant differences between B and C cluster groups in their neuropsychological functioning, but, instead, suggest that Cluster A could have some empirical validity based on executive prefrontal deficits (concept formation and sustained attention tasks) and clinical features. Similarly, no consistent differences among groups emerge when psychophysiological measures are compared. With regard to the Big-Five personality dimensions, the results also indicate that clusters may be more heterogeneous than the DSM-IV suggests. It appears, therefore, that the categorical division of DSM personality disorders into three discrete clusters may not be empirically justified.

URI:
https://hdl.handle.net/10651/76419
ISSN:
1015-5759
DOI:
10.1027/1015-5759.20.2.99
Colecciones
  • Artículos [37534]
Ficheros en el ítem
Métricas
Compartir
Exportar a Mendeley
Estadísticas de uso
Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Página principal Uniovi

Biblioteca

Contacto

Facebook Universidad de OviedoTwitter Universidad de Oviedo
El contenido del Repositorio, a menos que se indique lo contrario, está protegido con una licencia Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Creative Commons Image