RUO Principal

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo

Ver ítem 
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RUO Principal
  • Producción Bibliográfica de UniOvi: RECOPILA
  • Artículos
  • Ver ítem
    • español
    • English
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Listar

Todo RUOComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issnPerfil de autorEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_issn

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

AÑADIDO RECIENTEMENTE

Novedades
Repositorio
Cómo publicar
Recursos
FAQs

Identifying Avian Seed Dispersers through DNA Barcoding After Rapid Field Sampling

Autor(es) y otros:
González Varo, Juan PedroAutoridad Uniovi; Rumeu Ruiz, BeatrizAutoridad Uniovi; Traveset, Anna; Illera Cobo, Juan CarlosAutoridad Uniovi
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Versión del editor:
https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.69.2.2022.sc2
Citación:
Ardeola, 69(2), p. 279-290 (2022); doi:10.13157/arla.69.2.2022.sc2
Descripción física:
p. 279-290
Resumen:

Avian seed dispersers are mostly identified by direct observations of fruit consumption or by analysis of seeds ejected by mist-netted birds. However, these methods typically require many fieldwork days to provide initial insight into which bird species disperse the seeds of a plant species or community of interest. Here, we highlight the advantages of DNA-barcoding analysis after rapid field sampling to uncover unknown seed dispersers. By rapid field sampling we refer to searching and sampling bird-dispersed seeds during a short period of time (just a few hours) in places where the probability of seed deposition is high. This ‘one-day’ sampling strategy relies on a major advantage of DNA barcoding: it allows identifying disperser species during a relatively long period after they defecate or regurgitate seeds, over a time frame of several weeks. We showcase this methodological approach with three emblematic and threatened plant species for which there is little or no information on avian seed dispersal, either from their entire range or in certain populations. The approach can be cost-effective and very valuable for pilot studies aimed at providing initial information on poorly known systems, or in locations where periodical fieldwork is not feasible owing to accessibility or logistic constraints.

Avian seed dispersers are mostly identified by direct observations of fruit consumption or by analysis of seeds ejected by mist-netted birds. However, these methods typically require many fieldwork days to provide initial insight into which bird species disperse the seeds of a plant species or community of interest. Here, we highlight the advantages of DNA-barcoding analysis after rapid field sampling to uncover unknown seed dispersers. By rapid field sampling we refer to searching and sampling bird-dispersed seeds during a short period of time (just a few hours) in places where the probability of seed deposition is high. This ‘one-day’ sampling strategy relies on a major advantage of DNA barcoding: it allows identifying disperser species during a relatively long period after they defecate or regurgitate seeds, over a time frame of several weeks. We showcase this methodological approach with three emblematic and threatened plant species for which there is little or no information on avian seed dispersal, either from their entire range or in certain populations. The approach can be cost-effective and very valuable for pilot studies aimed at providing initial information on poorly known systems, or in locations where periodical fieldwork is not feasible owing to accessibility or logistic constraints.

Descripción:

Martínez-de la Puente, J., Díez-Fernández, A., Soriguer, R.C., Rambozzi, L., Peano, A., Meneguz, P.G. & Figuerola, J. (2021). Are malaria-infected birds more attractive to mosquito vectors? Ardeola, 68: 251-264. https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.68.1.2021.fo1

URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10651/64859
https://bioone.org/journals/ardeola/volume-68/issue-1
ISSN:
0570-7358
DOI:
10.13157/arla.69.2.2022.sc2
Patrocinado por:

This research was funded by a Spanish ‘Ramón y Cajal’ fellowship (RYC2017-22095) awarded to JPGV. BR has been supported by a Spanish ‘Juan de la Cierva – Incorporación’ fellowship (IJCI-2017-33475) and a postdoctoral grant from the University of Cádiz (UCA/REC17VPCT/2021). JCI was funded by two regional GRUPIN grants from the Regional Government of Asturias (Ref.: IDI/2018/000151 and Ref.: AYUD/2021/51261)

Colecciones
  • Artículos [37544]
  • Biología de Organismos y Sistemas [776]
  • Investigaciones y Documentos OpenAIRE [8416]
Ficheros en el ítem
Thumbnail
untranslated
Versión de la editorial (3.562Mb)
Métricas
Compartir
Exportar a Mendeley
Estadísticas de uso
Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Página principal Uniovi

Biblioteca

Contacto

Facebook Universidad de OviedoTwitter Universidad de Oviedo
El contenido del Repositorio, a menos que se indique lo contrario, está protegido con una licencia Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Creative Commons Image